色客影院桌面客户端已重新发布上架,可以前往顶部导航的下载中心进行下载!
您现在的位置:首页  »  战争片  »  www_552mm_com
丁香承认社区

外国成人网站有哪些在线观看

主演:
魏泽翔 蜀后主刘禅 程雷雨 林杰敏 刘盼盼 
状态:
64集
以下影片也许你会喜欢:
1314qu_com》简介:

 动听中国网址, 新的汽车销售管理办法出台 买车不用非去4S店 ,经典h动漫名字,分三大门类看,采矿业增加值同比下降2.4%,制造业增长7.4%,电力、热力、燃气及水生产和供应业增长8.9%。henhengan,骗提公积金的后果你知道吗?情节严重追究刑事责任,se妹妹导航,InternallydisplacedpeoplewhofledRaqqacitystandneartentsinacampinAinIssa,northofRaqqa,SyriaonApril3,2017.[Photo/Agencies]ThePulitzerPrize,whichwasawardedthisMonday,recognizesjournalists'excellentworkinquestioningandinvestigation.ItputintosharpcontrastthelackofqualityreportingonSyriabytheUSmainstreamnewsoutlets.TheApril4chemicalweaponsattackinSyriawhichkilledcivilians,includingchildren,wasshocking.Theperpetrators,whoevertheywere,shouldbeidentifiedandpunished.Yetbeforeanyinvestigationcouldevenbecarriedout,theUSgovernmentdecidedunilaterallyitwastheSyriangovernmentarmythatlaunchedtheattack.USPresidentDonaldTrumporderedanairstrikeontheSyrianal-Shayratairforcebase.Besidesdestroyingmilitaryjets,theairdefensesystemandotherlogisticalfacilities,thebombingkilledandinjuredanumberofcivilians.Inthepastweek,theUSmainstreammediahasmostlyfocusedonTrump'sU-turninhisSyriapolicy,orwhetheritmeansanotherIraqtypeofwar.FewhaveaskedwhetheritwastheSyriangovernmentarmyortheoppositionarmythatusedthechemicalweaponsorwhethertheUSairstrikeviolatedinternationallaw.Itremindsmanyofthesituationin2003whenthenUSsecretaryofstateColinPowellwenttotheUnitedNationstomakeacaseforinvadingIraq.Theargumentwaslaterfoundtobebasedonfalseevidence.Althoughtheyweresharplycriticallater,theunquestioningUSnewsmediaatthattimehasbeenwidelyviewedasstrengtheningthecredibilityofPowell.AccordingtoaUniversityofMarylandstudy,57percentofUSmainstreammediaviewersatthetimebelievedIraqsupportedal-QaidaandwasdirectlyinvolvedintheSept11attacksontheUSin2001.And69percentbelievedthatSaddamHusseinwaspersonallyinvolvedinthe9/11attacks.Noneofthesewastrue.Thistime,USmainstreamnewsoutlets,exceptthepublicservicenetworkC-SPAN,didnotevencovertheheateddebateattheemergencymeetingonSyriaattheUNSecurityCouncilonApril7,wherediverseviewswerepresented.Forexample,BolivianambassadortotheUNSachaLlorenti,holdinganenlargedphotoofPowellinhis2003presentationattheUN,saidtheallegedweaponofmassdestructionwasneverfound.Sweden'sambassadortotheUNOlofSkoogclaimedtheUSmissilestrike"raisesquestionsofcompatibilitywithinternationallaw."Underinternationallaws,suchanairstrikeonacountrywouldrequirethemandateoftheUNSecurityCouncilunlesstheUSwasactinginself-defense.Itwasnotjustthemainstreammedia.OpinionleadersinmajorUSthinktanksdidnotquestionthestrikemucheither.ExceptforthelibertarianCatoInstitute,fewraisedanyquestionsaboutthelegalityoftheairstrike.OfthefiveBrookingsInstitutionscholarswhopostedtheircommentsontheinstitute'swebsiteaftertheUSattack,onlyone,ChuckCall,raisedtheissue,saying"theactreflectsadisregardformultilateralorganizationsandapproaches,anditsinternationallegalbasisremainsunclear".CharlieSavageofTheNewYorkTimeswasprobablyoneofthefewUSjournaliststodelveintothelegalityissue.HislengthyarticleonFridaycalledtheairstrikeintoquestionunderbothinternationalanddomesticlaws.Asnationsmaketheirstancesknown,oneobviousquestionthatshouldberaisedishowsomecountriescansupporttheUSairstrikeatthesametimetheyarepushingforaninternationalinvestigation.Ifyousupportthelaunchof59TomahawkmissilesasapunishmentfortheSyriangovernment,youmustbecertainwhowastheperpetrator.Butwhenyousupportaninvestigation,itmeansthatyouarenotabsolutelysurewhoactuallyusedthechemicalweapons.IhavenotheardsuchabasicquestionraisedbyUSmainstreammedia.TheauthorisdeputyeditorofChinaDailyUSA.chenweihua@chinadailyusa.com